Monthly Archives: May 2012

82,000 Choices

I was reading  the other day that Starbuck’s has 82,000 choices available in just one store (give or take a few dozen) when it comes to combinations, etc. Diana Butler Bass in Christianity After Religion writes: 

“Americans, even those of modest means, exercise more choices in a single day than some of our ancestors did in a month or perhaps even a year. From the moment we awaken, we are bombarded with choices — from caffeinated or decaffeinated, to flipping on any one of a hundred television stations as we ready the children for school, to getting our news in print, online, or via a mobile device, to what sort of spinach to buy to go with dinner (local, organic, fresh, frozen, chopped, whole leaf, bagged, or bunched).”

A little later on, she writes:

“The economic, social, and political world in which we live has opened up the possibility for 82,000 choices at the coffee shop and probably about ten times that many when it comes to worshiping God and loving your neighbor. Some will choose well, others badly. Some will choose thoughtfully, others not so much. Some choose something new, others choose what they have always known. In the end, however, everybody chooses. Contemporary spirituality is a little like that line at the coffee shop. Everybody makes a selection. Even if you only want black coffee.”

Some churches would say we have a choice now, too … believe and be saved; don’t and be damned. But what I am really coming to believe is that because each one of us has a private relationship with God, there are infinite ways to approach religion and spirituality. So what’s the bid deal? It’s always been that way.

It’s only been in the folly of human minds that we think there’s any kind of unified “religion.”  Isn’t religion supposed to be just the way that we individuals come together in order to find a common way that doesn’t offend too many of us and share our spiritual experiences? We’re SUPPOSED to be individual … but that doesn’t mean we can’t have some practices in common. 

Isn’t is like a car dealership? Each car is individual but there’s a lot in common.

I don’t know… it all just seems like a lot of WORDS to provide an excuse for folks who want to keep division going.

To me it’s a lot like the presidential campaigning that’s going on now where we’re focused on dogs, on some pretty petty stuff. I just want to say, “C’mon, guys … let’s get down to the real issues here.”

President Obama is is on The View right now. I don’t normally watch it, but I really want to see him. They are talking with him about his new stand in support of gay marriage. That’s another thing… isn’t it like abortion? To be Pro Choice does not mean that you will FORCE someone t have one. It means a person has a choice. To be pro-gay marriage doesn’t mean that you have to FORCE people to support it. It means it’s a choice.

It’s a choice like our 82,000 choices at Starbuck’s.

Not every law, not every rule, not every religion or even every Christian Church is for everyone. We just have to have some grace and generosity of spirit so there’s room for everyone at the table.

Isn’t that what Jesus was all about?

I’m just sayin’ … 🙂 

Stepford Believers

Saw one of my friends today who was talking with me about “Stepford Clergy” and that brought me around to “Stepford Believers.” 

If it’s one thing that I’m sure of: the original followers (men and women) of Jesus were REAL PEOPLE with real emotions, real foibles, real problems, real temptations, and real joys! 

The goal of the church … or ANY body of believers … should not be to “even out” the emotions, but to engance and make them more visible, more contageous to other people. Don’t you think?

One reason I don’t want to be a runner is because I never see runners smiling. They’re always looking so serious — or so oblivious with their earbuds in. Maybe they don’t smile so that they don’t get bugs in their teeth …but any way you look at it, they’re not good marketers for their sport.

And churches?

The same thing. People either look pious or ecstatic. What ever happened to REAL? Just sloggin’ through life with an underlying joy and belief that all will work out eventually, but … 

How can we BE the people of God if we are not WITH  “the people?” 

How can there be Gospel without JUSTICE?

There can’t.

So don’t talk to me about believing but not doing … or about how you’ve “paid your dues” and shouldn’t have to contribute anymore. 

We are all sloggin’ through this together or we’re not. There’s no half-way!

Thus endeth the message for this morning!

Do we have to call it “Church?”

“A rose by any other name …”

I am so tired of how the whole concept of “church” and “religious community” has been co-opted by the conservative among us. They’re entitled to use the terms, for sure, but so are those of us on the Christian Left. (Check them out at http://www.thechristianleft.org/ or on Facebook and Twitter) I remember in seminary feeling like “I want my Jesus back.”

Well, guess what! “Jesus” and “Christian”  DO  issue forth from my lips and I rather like it because J (as I call him … we’re on a first letter basis) was/is a kick-@## kind of guy and one I can really relate to. He IS a figure for the 21st century.

But what about those places where we gather to talk about him and his rockin’ ways? Do we have to call it “church?” What awful associations that word has with hypocrisy, and  killing people (hello, Inquisition), with antisemitism, heterosexism and use of abusive power. I mean really … why WOULD anyone want to join a group with that kind of history and bad press.

If only we could use another word … “fellowship” is just to male for me … what are some more ideas?

See … until we can get people passed that whole association-thing, it will be nearly impossible t get them to envision what it MIGHT be like to have a group of like-minded people living a collective life working toward justice for ALL everywhere, with no strings (you have to believe or you don’t get the help) attached.

Sometimes I think small “house gatherings” are the way to go and have them all be “pods” connected to each other so that once a month everybody would come together for a larger group experience.That might be cool. And share the expenses, governance, etc.

Enough for this morning. My brain’s gonna fall out now.

Hope you have a good day wrestling with some of this stuff.

Deb

So What Now?

I’ve started reading Christianity After Religion: The End of Church and the Birth of a New Spiritual Awakening by Diana Butler-Bass. So much of what I’m reading is just what I struggle with:  the nature of God and how to share that with others in a world where the very word “God” is a turn-off for so many people. How can I bring people to understand what it is to be in relationship with Creator when they don’t want to even think of (or admit to) there being a Creator. 

I don’t, for a minute, think that I am meant to run around and convince people to be Christian. But I DO believe that we are supposed to bring people to their own relationships with that One. We model … we talk about … we LIVE that relationship and I guess that’s all we can do, but I have to say that I wish we could find a way to reach OUT and prompt dialogue about these topics.

Any ideas?